Tamara Zidansek vs Veronika Erjavec Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Erjavec has outperformed Zidansek on second serve points, winning 45.29% compared to Zidansek's 40.31%. Could this give Erjavec an edge in this match?
• When focusing on return game stats, Zidansek shows stronger performance, winning 52.99% of points on the opponent's second serve versus Erjavec's 46.67%.
• Zidansek has a slight advantage in first serve return points, with a success rate of 35.84% compared to Erjavec's 34.12%.
• Under pressure, Erjavec excels, saving 49.84% of breakpoints, while Zidansek saves 44.12%.
• Over the past year, Zidansek has a slightly higher match win rate of 57.89%, compared to Erjavec's 54.1%.
• Zidansek has a notable advantage on clay with a career win percentage of 72%, but performs less on grass with 38% wins.
• In contrast, Erjavec's best surface is grass with a 67% win rate; however, they are not as strong on hard courts where they win 45% of matches.
• Zidansek has been more successful in higher-level tournaments, winning 61.54% of matches at the Challengers/ITF level, whereas Erjavec has a 50% win rate at similar tournament levels.
• The average rank of opponents faced by Zidansek (208.74) is slightly better than those Erjavec has faced (210.31).
• In deciding sets, Erjavec edges past Zidansek, winning 58% to Zidansek's 56%.
• Zidansek's break point conversion rate of 40.93% surpasses Erjavec's 34.98%, indicating a strong ability to seize key moments in matches.

Editorial Prediction (August 1, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent trends, Erjavec boasts a better performance on second serve points, potentially offering an advantage in maintaining serve under pressure. Meanwhile, Zidansek displays stronger stats in returning both first and second serves, which could be crucial if Erjavec's serve falters.

When defending breakpoints, Erjavec holds the upper hand. However, Zidansek’s ability to convert breakpoints may significantly impact match dynamics. Zidansek's overall superior win rate in the past year, alongside their effective breakpoint conversion, suggests a competitive edge.

Surface strengths might not play a decisive role unless the match is on clay or grass. Considering the recent form and consistent playing against slightly higher-ranked opponents, Zidansek appears to be positioned well heading into this match.

Based on these factors, Zidansek is likely to emerge as the winner in this encounter, provided they effectively capitalize on breakpoint opportunities and maintain resilience in return games.